In this week's Camino a Ìtaca I use a word that I never thought I would in the newspaper. Click over to read the originally published piece in Spanish in the HOY or read the English translation below. (PDF en castellano abajo).
I often wonder just how many
times Maria Guardiola plays that crucial time in her life over and over in her
mind. That moment where overnight she went from being a small fringe figure on
the national political scene to becoming headline national news for speaking, at
least what we believed at the time, her mind.
Do those vigorously
communicated words that supposedly demonstrated her values and what she
believed in play on a continuous loop in her dreams. Or does she need to recur
to the help of a pharmacist just to get a few hours of uninterrupted sleep?
This after she was so unceremoniously forced to swallow her words and go
against everything she had promised and accept the line mandated from Madrid?
Did getting into bed with the new blue shirts make for difficult nights?
Does seeing those who deny
gender violence every day in her government make her a bit queasy, like riding
on a ship on a stormy sea? When she thinks of the word ‘dehumanize’ does she
think of all of those who have recently been settled in the region from the
Canaries and the vile rhetoric the ultra-right party has slandered against them?
What about all those
cultural battles that she swore had been overcome? Do they come to haunt her
like Dicken’s ghost of Christmas past every time her partners open their mouths?
Does she cringe on each occasion that her coalition partners give a press
conference, worrying just how many of her damning words they make come true?
Then there are the rights that
women have fought long and hard for that she once claimed were inalienable,
like the right to abortion. Did she really mean what she said about red lines
or are they too going to be placed on the table when she needs the fascists’
support?
A recent event in Caceres
might shed some light on what could happen in the future. It all took place
when the ultra-right party led by Eduardo Gutiérrez managed to push through a
motion with an obvious ideological bias against abortion in a plenary session.
As the mayor Rafa Mateos needs the green party’s support so that they will vote
in favor of the 2024 budget, the PP chose not to abstain, but to actually vote
in favor of a measure that looked as if it had been plucked from
anti-abortionist publicity moldering in the entranceways to churches.
In the motion it called for “support for life through specific information provided by experts in the field, promoting a specific area of dissemination on the reality of abortion and its after-effects, with lectures and talks in high schools and focused on adolescents.”
Which begs the question if
those who fervently believe that you’ll anger an all-powerful sky god by
placing a latex sheath over a penis or that a Bedouin girl was miraculously impregnated
by a pigeon so many years ago could actually be considered experts in the area
of reproductive health.