The bins are burning in Barcelona again (remind me to get into the replacement business there) for, what on the surface has been sold as a freedom of speech issue. And while freedom of speech does play a significant role in the case of a rapper sent to prison, his right to an opinion is eclipsed and sullied with the violence he espouses. This week's Camino a Ítaca looks at the need for free speech and those that I love listening to who have long demanded it. You can read the originally published piece here in Spanish or the English below. (version en castellano en PDF tambien abajo)
Rap just never did it for me. The ethereal sound of Johnny Hodges soloing over a Duke Ellington melody, the frantic fretboard work of Buddy Guy, the earnest exhortation to 'respect yourself' from Mavis Staples or the slick groove of Nile Rodger's Le Freak are all examples of Black music that I couldn't even conceive of life without. Rap though, just never resonated with me. I can appreciate it from a sociological perspective and recognize the undeniably crucial role that it has played in the black community throughout its ongoing struggle, but it just doesn't hit me the same way as Billie Holiday rasping about strange fruit swinging from the trees in the southern breeze.But one thing is not to like it and another is to be sent to court for it.
Cities are burning at night in Spain for the words of an artist. An artist who has been sent to prison for praising terrorists and inciting violence, messages that clearly have no place in a modern democracy. What I can't understand though is that he has also been found guilty and fined for insulting a medieval idea, for insulting the 'crown'. It's something straight out of a Monty Python sketch or Mel Brooks movie, and would be as comical, if it wasn't so serious. Apparently it still is good to be the king and heaven forbid that one of his subjects were to question his divine right. If a hereditary job title wasn't atavistic enough, fining someone for the equivalent of scribbling on the bathroom walls is antediluvian. It's as absurd as taking a necromancer to court because they gave you the wrong lottery numbers or your pyromancer because she gave you the wrong job advice. It's a blind leap into a very dark past.
Paraphrasing Salman Rushdie, a man who knows a thing or two about medieval beliefs impinging on his freedoms, he once wrote that creativity not only needs freedom in order to thrive, but the very assumption of freedom. If an artist worries about whether or not they will be thrown in jail for their work in the future, then they are not free today. If there is a climate of fear regarding what you can do, create or say, then their art will not be shaped and determined by their talents but by fear.
Censorship is on the rise, and it's not only coming from fanciful crowns, conservative judiciaries or turbaned islamofascists. Interest groups, faith groups, gender warriors, anti-bull fighting lobbies, and safe-zone universities are all guilty of attempting to sanitize discussion and thought by censoring it completely. And for what? For fear of offending somebody, for fear of saying that Thor's hammer only exists in Marvel movies, for fear of hurting someone's feelings? This self-censorship not only stifles creativity but also drives loonier ideas into fetid, dark corners, allowing them to mutate and multiply rather than be exposed to the blinding light of truth and reason. If what the rapper said was indeed untrue, confront it with facts, not with excessive fines and prison sentences.
Blasphemy, elves, insults to the crown and those that wear them belong in fairy tales and have no place in modern legal codes. I may not like rap, but it's looking like we need to listen to the great man from Jamaica and Get Up and Stand Up, otherwise Sam Cooke's promised change will never come.